CBT Cards / Thought vs fact

Thought vs fact

Educational resource

Separate what you know from what you are interpreting, predicting, or assuming, without pretending that every thought is wrong.

The CBT Cards mascot sorts blank cards into several evidence groups beside an open notebook.
Observable information and interpretation can be considered separately without assuming either is unimportant.

What “thought vs fact” means here

Thought vs Fact is a CBT Cards reflection tool for pausing between an event and the meaning you are giving it. A fact is something you can describe or verify directly. A thought may be an interpretation, assumption, prediction, judgement, or conclusion about those facts.

The exercise is not a claim that thoughts are bad or false. Interpretations are necessary. The point is to make the distinction visible so that you can decide whether another interpretation also fits the available information.

Example

Observation: “I sent a message yesterday and have not received a reply.”

Interpretation: “They are ignoring me because I did something wrong.”

That interpretation may turn out to be correct, incorrect, or partly correct. The exercise simply separates what is known now from what is being inferred.

Questions you can use

  • What do I directly know happened?
  • What am I adding as an explanation or prediction?
  • What evidence supports that explanation?
  • What information does not fit it?
  • Is there another explanation that also fits the facts?

In CBT Cards

The app includes a Thought vs Fact tool alongside cards, guided protocols, metaphors, and the structured journal. Use it as a brief reflection aid, not as a test that declares a thought objectively true or false.

Sources and related reading

Last reviewed by the CBT Cards project: 18 August 2026. This is an educational reflection tool, not a diagnostic method.

Continue from here

Choose the next useful step.