Toolkit review status

Default rule

If a source record is not explicitly listed in the CBT Cards review registry, treat it as unreviewed and source_only. Its presence in the source corpus does not mean CBT Cards has approved it for standalone publication.

The machine-readable registry is data/toolkit-review.json.

What “reviewed for publication” means

reviewed_for_publication means the CBT Cards project performed an editorial and safety review for a public website page. It does not mean the technique has been clinically validated by CBT Cards, proven effective for a condition, or recommended for an individual.

Currently published source records

• card-4 — Challenge Your Thoughts
• card-15 — Worry Box
• card-16 — Big Goals, Small Steps
• card-21 — Thoughts ≠ Facts
• card-27 — Socratic Questioning
• card-32 — Ground Yourself

Known source-quality boundaries

• The pinned source corpus contains 115 records, but the source schema does not encode CBT Cards-specific clinical-review or publication status.
• Source records protocol-1 and protocol-8 share the title “Burnout Recovery Protocol”. Stable source IDs, not titles, are authoritative.
• The corpus contains CBT-adjacent terminology and techniques. A record should not be relabeled as CBT solely because it appears in a dataset named CBT Toolkit.
• Protocol records remain source-only unless they are explicitly added to the review registry after separate editorial and safety review.

For agents and data consumers

Consult the review registry before presenting a raw toolkit record as CBT Cards-published content. When a record is not listed, identify it as raw source content and preserve the general-wellness boundary.

See also source provenance, the agent guide, and the public changelog.